City Design.

Павел Кругляковский
Настроение: всем пиздец !!!
Музыка: та какая там музыка :)

Сегодня в полночь запустилось в работу устройство, способное уничтожить Землю

Европейский центр ядерных исследований CERN сегодня в полночь запускает в работу Большой адронный коллайдер - мощнейший ускоритель элементарных частиц, который, по мнению некоторых экспертов, способен уничтожить все живое на Земле.

Большой адронный коллайдер (БАК), который должен стать мощнейшим в мире устройством, позволит ответить на многие фундаментальные вопросы современной физики.

Специалисты полагают, что данное устройство даст информацию о происхождении Вселенной, поскольку позволит воссоздать условия, имевшие место спустя одну триллионную долю секунды после Большого взрыва. Хотя, возможно, что скоро наша планета прекратит свое существование.

По мнению некоторых физиков, существует отличная от нуля вероятность выхода проводимых в коллайдере экспериментов из-под контроля и развития цепной реакции, которая при определенных условиях теоретически может уничтожить всю планету.

Специалисты полагают, что в коллайдере могут появиться микроскопические черные дыры или же образуются сгустки антиматерии, которые захватят окружающую нас материю.

Следует отметить, что на все эти доводы исследователи CERN приводят научные данные, согласно которым подобные опасения признаются необоснованными.

Рекомендовать запись
Оцените пост:

Показать смайлы

Комментариев: 18

?How to build and be able to write an analytic essay Argument . Creating an analytic essay requires you make some sort of argument. The core of this argument is called a thesis. It is your claim, succinctly stated inside of a one sentence. What do budding literary critics these types of as yourselves argue about? You make a pervasive, persistent case that a certain thing is true about a piece of literature. This "thing" should not be readily obvious to the casual reader for the literature in question. It is what you draw out from the book or essay, how you interpret it. It is known as a claim that must be supported by unique evidence from the textual content. Thesis statement: At least once during the course of composing your essay, isolate what you consider to be your thesis. Is your proposition each arguable and reasonable? If it is obvious (i.e. Mary Rowlandson put to use the Bible for comfort during her captivity) you don?t have an argument. Argument requires analysis (i.e. taking things apart and explaining them). An individual examination that may help is asking yourself what the opposite "side" of your argument would be. A effective, complicated thesis (which was proposed by one particular of your classmates) is usually that "Although Mary Rowlandson says she often utilised the Bible as a source of comfort during her captivity, a closer reading of her narrative suggests her faith may have been a whole lot more troubled by her undergo than she allows on." A particular useful structure for creating thesis statements is the "although" type utilized higher than: "Although x appears to be true about this piece of literature, y is in fact additional true (or makes our thinking about x significantly more complex)." In such a type you existing the two sides of your argument at once and demonstrate which side you?re on. Your job around the paper is to convince your reader to join you. Another way to write down an effective thesis statement is to utilize the kind "If we look and feel closely at x (e.g. how Bradford defines freedom) we discover y (that ). In order to obtain something to argue: Seem for photos or metaphors that the author works by using consistently. What other sort of pattern can you identify around the textual content? How do you interpret this pattern so that your reader will understand the book, essay, poem, speech, etc. a lot better? What philosophical, moral, ethical, etc. ideas is the author advocating or opposing? What are the consequences of accepting the author's argument? Explain how the do the job functions as a piece of rhetoric-- how does the author attempt to convince his or her reader of something? For instance, what widely held beliefs do they use to service their argument? How do they appeal to emotions, logic? Re-examine something that the textual content or most readers take for granted (that Thoreau?s book Walden represents his attempt to escape from society). Question this major premise and see where it takes you Ask yourself if an author?s literary argument is inconsistent with itself or is in some way philosophically "dangerous," inadequate, unethical, or misleading. Examine how characters are presented inside of a story. How do they help the main character to create? Which characters are trustworthy? Which are not? Why are they presented this way? What counts as evidence: Structure . How the parts of your book or essay follow 1 another; how the parts are assembled to make a whole? Why does the author get started where they launch, conclusion where they stop? What is the sensible progression of thought? How could possibly that progression be intended to affect the reader What effect would likely this progression of ideas have with a generic reader or on the reader from the time period in which the give good results was written? Does the piece move from the general to the distinct or vice versa? Any time you could divide the book/essay into sections, units of meaning, what would those sections be? How are they related to every other? Note that chapters, when they variety obvious sections can themselves be grouped. Referring to the textual content . In composing analytic papers that address any kind of literature, it is necessary to refer to the textual content (the precise words over the web site in the book) in order to guidance your argument. This implies which you must quote and interpret passages that demonstrate or guidance your argument. Quotation is usually stronger than paraphrase. Remember also that your purpose in crafting an essay is simply not merely to paraphrase or summarize (repeat) what the author has explained, but to make an argument about how the make their point, or how they have stated what they have says. Language . comes with the way an author phrases his or her sentences, the key metaphors utilised (it?s up to you to definitely explain how these metaphors are made use of, why these metaphors are acceptable, effective, ineffective, or ambiguous). Is the way a sentence is phrased particularly revealing within the author?s meaning? Practical Essay-writing Hints: Please title your paper and make the title apt and enticing--I LOVE a quality title. It puts me in a very solid mood before I get started reading. Be clear about whether you?re producing about a book, an essay (non-fiction, short prose), a story (short fiction) a poem, a novel (book-length fiction), an autobiography, a narrative (as in Captivity Narratives) etc. Walden is a really book comprised of chapters. Each and every of these chapters could also be called an essay. Inside these essays, Thoreau usually tells stories. The book itself is not really a story, but closer to your narrative, which is non-fiction. Always go through at least two drafts of you paper . Let your paper sit, preferably for 24 hours involving drafts sometime during the operation of your producing. Eliminate initially person pronoun ("I") in the final draft (it?s OK for rough drafts and may help you craft). If your paragraphs are a bit more a total site or added in duration it is even more than possible that they are tooooooo longer . Probably you have too various ideas "in the air" at once. Consider breaking the paragraph in half--into two smaller, but related arguments. Your reader needs a break, needs alot more structure in order to be able to follow your meaning. If several of your paragraphs are exceedingly short (4-5 lines), it is doubtless which you are not developing your ideas thoroughly enough--that you might be crafting notes rather than analysis. Short paragraphs are usually applied as transitional paragraphs, not as content paragraphs. (Short paragraphs may be used inside the rhetorical devise of reversal where you lead your reader down a certain path (to reveal them a single side belonging to the argument, the a single you could be going to oppose) and then turn absent from that argument to state the true argument of your paper.) Employ quotation often. One particular quotation for each argumentative paragraph is usually necessary. Based upon the duration and complexity with the passage or topic you're dealing with, a whole lot more quotations may be useful to prevent you from having too far absent from the textual content. Your quotations combined with your interpretations are your proof. Be sure that you choose to demonstrate your reader how they should interpret these quotations in order to follow your argument. (Almost every quotation should be followed by an interpretation, a deeper reading of what is being mentioned and how its being explained. This interpretation demonstrates how the quotation supports the claim you're making about it). Spend attention to metaphor, phrasing, tone, alliteration, etc. How is the author saying what they are saying--what does that teach us about the textual content? Remember to jot down directive (from time to time called "topic") sentences for your personal paragraphs . The for starters sentence of any paragraph should give your reader an idea of what the paragraph is going to say and how the paragraph will connect to the larger argument. It should have a little more to do with what you should say about the materials than what the author him or herself has stated. Transitions somewhere between paragraphs . try to get absent from by means of "The next," "First of all" "Another thing. " to connect your paragraphs. This is the "list" method of structuring a paper--not an integrated, sensible method. A really potent transition makes the rational relationship involving paragraphs or sections of the paper and gives the reader a feeling you?re developing an argument. To make sure you're making a well-connected argument, ask yourself how the last sentence of every paragraph along with the to begin with sentence within the next are connected. Just about every belonging to the sentences in just your paragraphs should be related somehow (follow from, refer to, etc.) the a single that precedes it, additionally, the an individual which follows it. This will help the reader follow the flow of your ideas. The order of your paragraphs should reveal a developing argument. Over the most simple stage, you should be able to consciously justify the presence and placement of every word in every sentence, every sentence in every paragraph, every paragraph in every essay . To repeat: in revising your papers after the primary draft (which is always, inevitably to some degree confused mainly because that you are involved inside the method of working your ideas out), you should be highly conscious of what you may be doing and why you will be doing it. Return to American Literature Homepage


Ко мне заходят из ...

Отделение банка


Из каких краев посетители

В Контакте

Me On MySpace


Мой хомяк

Доска для рисования

:::::: ПРОПАГАНДА ::::::


Погода в главных местах